In a hangout that Google’s Gary Illyes did with Bruce Clay yesterday, the topic of Panda came up. While many SEOs refer to Panda as a penalty, and some argue it acts like a penalty, it is actually considered a search filter, since it is applied after the core algo. And Illyes said that they don’t think of it as a penalty at all.
So with Panda, we don’t think as a penalty. About Panda we think more as a general ranking update. And long term, I would like to change people’s perception about how they think about Panda, for example, because in our view it’s really not a penalty.
Illyes talks about it more as an adjustment to ensure that sites prominent in the search results are ones that have great content for the query and not sites that don’t have great content to match the queries.
Illyes has talked previously about how Google sees many of the algo adjustments not as penalties but rather filters, particularly the duplicate content filter, which most SEOs still continue to call a duplicate content penalty.
Jennifer Slegg
Latest posts by Jennifer Slegg (see all)
- 2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates - August 1, 2022
- Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update - October 19, 2021
- Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update - April 23, 2021
- New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met - October 16, 2020
- Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters - October 6, 2020