At SMX Advanced last week, Gary Illyes from Google commented on the issue, naming Forbes specifically, and said that those links are worthless.
He also commented on the fact they devalue or ignore bad links, which reflects the changes we saw in Penguin, where Google devalues those links rather than penalizing for them.
He also added that those sites buying links are throwing their money away.
That said, sometimes those types of links can bring exposure, and links from other sites who saw the reference in the original article, which can be worth the money spent. But if bought for the exposure alone, then the links should be nofollowed to not run the risk of a link based manual action from Google.
But if you are tempted to buy a link from a major publication for the SEO link value alone, there is a good chance Google wouldn’t be counting it as contributing value to your site.
Jennifer Slegg
Latest posts by Jennifer Slegg (see all)
- 2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates - August 1, 2022
- Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update - October 19, 2021
- Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update - April 23, 2021
- New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met - October 16, 2020
- Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters - October 6, 2020