We don’t have any strict guidelines on what’s shown there and what’s not. It’s essentially a sample of the links. So for smaller sites, it’s probably more closer to all of the links, for larger sites it is definitely a sample where we try to show the ones that are more relevant.
It doesn’t take things out that are nofollow, it doesn’t take things out that are in the disavow file. So it’s more a matter of we know all of these links exist for your site, and here is what we think is a relevant sample for yours.
He was asked for more clarification about what would qualify as a “smaller site” but he didn’t give any specifics.
I don’t know where we would draw the line there. But it’s something where we have a limited storage available for these links within Search Console, so at some point they get cut off.
For those that dig into the link report for a variety of sites, this is probably more obvious. But for those with only smaller sites, or with only a small number of sites, they might see differences as their sites grow and earn more backlinks.
Jennifer Slegg
Latest posts by Jennifer Slegg (see all)
- 2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates - August 1, 2022
- Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update - October 19, 2021
- Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update - April 23, 2021
- New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met - October 16, 2020
- Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters - October 6, 2020