The invalid URLs, which is obvious from the display URL, are linked to httphttp://www.thewoodmark.com/
It also shows incorrectly when it appears as the expanded local listing in the top of the search results.
The URL in the regular organic search results is correct.
It happened to be a result I had taken a screenshot of on May 9th, and the URL appeared correctly, so the change was made by either the business or Bing within the last few weeks.
Here is how the listing was displayed then.
This is actually a common mistake – whether you submit a URL with or without the http:// on the front, although now most forms specify whether you need to include it or not.
It is curious that there seems to be no backend check on Bing’s end that either checks for invalid URLs when it is submitted, or that checks for broken links and flags them.
While it is not exactly sure who made the mistake, it is definitely unusual since it had the correct URL originally. So it is probably worth the few extra seconds to ensure your Bing Places for Business are using the correct URLs, and make any fixes needed.
Jennifer Slegg
Latest posts by Jennifer Slegg (see all)
- 2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates - August 1, 2022
- Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update - October 19, 2021
- Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update - April 23, 2021
- New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met - October 16, 2020
- Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters - October 6, 2020