For example, here is a site search on Bing for they “SEO” keyword.
Using the marshmallow article, Google’s result does not include any dates at all, making it unclear simply from looking at the search results how recently it was updated.
This is a test Bing is running. I only saw it in one browser session but not another. I only saw it for wikiHow results, although they could be appearing for other sites as well.
Added: It could also be very spammable. Since Bing is only using wikiHow’s “word” on how many page views it has, if this becomes widespread it could definitely turn into an issue where webmasters inflate that view count to make an article seem much more popular than it really is.
We have definitely seen this happen when it comes to the number of reviews a website or product has that shows up in the search results, where a days old site will show thousands of reviews.
Jennifer Slegg
Latest posts by Jennifer Slegg (see all)
- 2022 Update for Google Quality Rater Guidelines – Big YMYL Updates - August 1, 2022
- Google Quality Rater Guidelines: The Low Quality 2021 Update - October 19, 2021
- Rethinking Affiliate Sites With Google’s Product Review Update - April 23, 2021
- New Google Quality Rater Guidelines, Update Adds Emphasis on Needs Met - October 16, 2020
- Google Updates Experiment Statistics for Quality Raters - October 6, 2020